IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (120)

Date of Decision:-13.01.2026 RAM KUMAR AND OTHERS … Petitioners Versus RAJESH ... Respondent -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Partap Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 23.09.2025 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Karnal, whereby, the application filed by the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC has been dismissed.

2. Briefly, respondent/plaintiff alleges that an agreement to sell has been executed in his favour in respect of suit land measuring 66 kanal 06 marlas and respondent/plaintiff filed initially a suit for permanent injunction restraining petitioners from alienating the property on the allegations that they are attempting to breach the alleged agreement and ad interim injunction was granted in favour of respondent/plaintiff. When the suit was still pending, respondent/plaintiff instituted another Civil Suit No. CS/1113/2024 seeking possession by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell. The filing o