SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 25015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHAILESH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Chailesh Sharma ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent Date of decision: 15.01.2026 Date of Uploading : 15.01.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present second petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.339 dated 27.12.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 & 120-B of IPC at Police Station Udyog Vihar, District Gurugram.

2. The petitioner had earlier applied for grant of regular bail before this Court which was dismissed as withdrawn on 11.08.2025. The relevant part of said order reads as under:-

“3. Learned counsels for the petitioner(s), after arguing for sometime, seek to withdraw the petition(s) in hand, at this stage..

4. Ordered accordingly.”

3. The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the complainant, Amit Kumar Singh, Authorised Signatory of One97 Communications Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘OCL’), lodged a complaint alleging large-scale fin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top