268 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-666-2025(O&M)

Date of Decision: 16.01.2026 M/S PIONEER FACILITY MANAGEMENT LIMITED ....Petitioner(s)

Versus DALIP KHUBCHANDANI .....Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Rajat Khanna, Advocate, for the petitioner.

None for the respondent.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an independent Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences which have arisen between the parties pertaining to an agreement entered into between the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there was an agreement (Annexure P-1) between the parties wherein there exists a valid arbitration clause i.e. Clause 10(xix) which provides that in the event of any differences or disputes arising between the Maintenance Agency and the User in respect of any matter connected with the accuracy of bills, supply of services or interpretation of any of these terms and conditions which cannot be dotermined amicably, or