SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 25327

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

222 CRM-M-67019-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.01.2026 Sahil ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present : Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the complainant *****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.184 dated 05.11.2024, registered under Section 25 of Arms Act, 109(1), 3(5), 351(2), 61 of BNS at Police Station Bond Kalan, Charkhi Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri.

2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for 1 year and about 2 months. He alleges false implication. He is stated to have not fired, which though is an allegation against co-accused Rohit and Aman Khanna, who are in custody. Charges have been framed on 15.05.2025 and out of 25 prosecution witnesses, only 5 have been examined, however, application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is still pending. The petitioner is not involved in any other case.

3. The custody certificate dated 16.01.2026, filed by the learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top