SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 26296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUNISH KUMAR SAINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH MUNISH KUMAR SAINI ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent A N D

246 CRM-M-3223-2026 Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 JAI SAGAR ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL.

****

Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-69314-2025.

Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-3223-2026.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Both these petitions are being decided by this common order since they arise out of the same FIR.

2. These petitions have been filed under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail for the petitioners in case FIR No.326 dated 21.08.2025 under Sections 318(4), 338 and 340 of BNS. 2023 registered at Police Station Sirsa Sadar, District Sirsa, Haryana.

3. The allegations against petitioner Manish Kumar Saini are that he procured a forged jamabandi and thereby obtained false No Dues Certificate, which was used for execution and registration of the sale deed in question. Further, he being a Clerk, had shown the village land as urban land in order to skip the procedure for get

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top