SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 26418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondents Date of decision: 29.01.2026 Date of Uploading : 29.01.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mrs. Mahima Yashpal, Senior DAG Haryana.

Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and Section 483(2) read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order 20.07.2023 and 20.09.2023 passed by this Court in FIR No.88 dated 16.05.2023 registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 457, 384, 467, 419, 471, 201, 120-B, 341, 389 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Nagina, District Nuh (Mewat).

2. Briefly stated, the FIR in question was registered on the basis of complaint moved by the petitioner alleging therein that on 29.03.2023, three persons came to his house in a Tata Harrier car bearing registration No. CH-01-CJ-7254 and posed as officers of the Enforcement Directorate. Thereafter, they threatened him with false implica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top