IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AJIT YADAV ALIAS AJIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-65631-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(250) CRM-M-65631-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision : 29.01.2026
AJIT YADAV @ AJIT KUMAR ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana
**** (cid:1)
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under
Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”)
for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.114 dated 10.05.2024
registered under Sections 120-B, 386 and 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms
Act, 1959 (Section 384 of IPC and Sections 25(1-B)a, 25(6), 29(b), 25(1a) of
Arms Act, 1959 added later on) at Police Station Farukhnagar, District
Gurugram.
2. As per the allegations, on 10.05.2024, ASI Sanjay Kumar posted at
the aforementioned Police Station, received a secret information that some
members of Lawrence Bishnoi gang, namely Rohit Godara, Naveen Boxer,
Lipan Nehra and Pawan Nehra, were active in the city of Gurugram for extorting
money from businessmen and rich people. The main members of the group
were operating from foreign countries, some of them were lodged in jails and all
AMIT SHARMA
2026.01.29 19:12
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE2##CRM-M-65631-2025 (O&M) 2
of them were into contact with each other through different social media apps.
It was also informed that they had even got murdered one businessman Sachin
Goda in Rohtak. One of the members of this gang namely Rohit Godara had
raised demand of ransom money of Rs.2 crores from owner of Maniram Grocery
Store, Gurugram. It was informed that if the above mentioned persons and other
members of the gang were apprehended and interrogated, huge quantity of
contraband, ransom money and weapons could be recovered from them. On the
basis of this information, the aforementioned FIR was registered. Investigation
proceedings were initiated. During investigation, accused Dinesh @ Dinu was
arrested on 10.05.2024. Recovery of two mobile phones, one .30 bore
countrymade pistol alongwith five live cartridges was effected from him. On his
identification, co-accused Jagdish @ Jaggu, Pardeep, Sagar and Vishnu were
also arrested on 12.05.2024, from whom different arms and ammunitions were
recovered. Accused Ritesh @ Arya and Himanshu were arrested on 18.05.2024.
One vehicle used by accused HImanshu at the time of committing offences had
been recovered. Subsequently, accused Rupesh @ Naman, Ashish @ Deva,
Harpal, Karan @ Kannu and Iqbal Singh @ Bill were arrested. Subsequently,
accused-Lokesh Kumar was arrested on 06.02.2025. He got recovered one
carbine weapon alongwith magazine. On interrogation, he suffered disclosure
statement on the basis of which the present petitioner was nominated as an
accused and was arrested on 14.02.2025. He too suffered disclosure statement
admitting his involvement in the crime and got recovered one pistol and five
cartridges. Some other accused were arrested subsequently. Investigation now
stands completed and the petitioner alongwith the co-accused is facing time for
commission of aforementioned offences.
AMIT SHARMA
2026.01.29 19:12
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE3##CRM-M-65631-2025 (O&M) 3
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in this case on the basis of the disclosure statement of the co-
accused which cannot be considered to be admissible in evidence. A false
recovery has been planted upon him. He is in custody since long. The co-
accused Vidyadhar, Himanshu, Jaiprakash have been extended benefit of bail.
On parity, he too deserves to be given the same benefit. His involvement in
other cases cannot be considered to be a reason for denying benefit of bail to
him. He has a permanent abode. There are no chances of his absconding, if
extended benefit of bail. The only role attributed to him is that he had rece
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.