IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 MOHIT NEHRA ......Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Lakshya Saini, Advocate, Mr. Utsav Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocate and Mr. Harjit Yadav, Advocate for the respondent No.2.

****

KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for quashing of FIR No. 164 dated 14.06.2023, under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 363 and 366-A of IPC, registered at Police Station Rampura, District Rewari and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on the statement of respondent No.3, who is father of the prosecutrix-respondent No.2. In fact, the petitioner and respondent No.2 were well known to each other and now they have performed marriage on 20.12.2024, and are residing happily together as husband and wi