SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JASWANT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KULJIT KUMAR @ KULJEET KUMAR – Respondent
CR/6993/2019



CR-6993-2019

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR-6993-2019

Date of decision: 05.11.2019

Jaswant Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

Kuljit Kumar @ Kuljeet Kumar

...Respondent

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Tapish Kumar Gupta, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

***

Ritu Bahri, J.

Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 04.10.2019

(Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana,

whereby application filed by the defendant-petitioner for recalling of the

plaintiff (respondent) and his witnesses for their cross-examination, has

been dismissed.

Grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been allowed to

cross-examine the witnesses of the plaintiff. A perusal of the impugned

order dated 04.10.2019 (Annexure P-1) shows that learned counsel for

defendant has been regularly appearing before the trial Court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that only presence of

counsel was marked before the trial Court, but actually, he had not appeared

in this case.

This argument is liable to be rejected as Mr. Sumit Kumar,

Advocate, had put in appearance on behalf of the defendant. In view of the

said fact, trial Court ha rightly dismissed the application of defendant

(petitioner herein) for recalling the witnesses of plaintiff for their cross-

AJAY PRASHER

2019.11.08 08:51

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

CR-6993-2019

-2-

examination on the ground that learned counsel for the defendant had put in

appearance at every stage of the trial. Moreover, witnessess of the plaintiff

had come present, but defendant failed to cross-examine them despite

availing sufficient opportunities.

In view of the above, the impugned order does not suffer from

any illegality, much less perversity, warranting interference by this Court.

No merits.

Dismissed.

(RITU BAHRI)

05.11.2019

JUDGE

ajp

Whether speaking/reasoned

Yes/No

Whether reportable

Yes/No

AJAY PRASHER

2019.11.08 08:51

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top