SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7902

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHEEL NAGU, CJ, SANJIV BERRY, J
Kuljit Singh Bedi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Punjab and others – Respondent
CWP-PIL-30-2026 (O&M)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Chirag Girdhar, Mr. Amanveer Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Mr. Rajeev Madaan, Mr. Sangam Garg

PIL not maintainable if personal interest camouflaged as public cause.

Headnote:No specific statutes analyzed. Petitioner filed PIL challenging tender processes for road up-gradation and beautification in Mohali under Next Generation Programme. Court found petitioner's affidavit disclosed political affiliation and table in petition revealed personal interest in horticulture work, contradicting counsel's explanation. Pleadings lacked support for factual corrections and representations were unproduced. Court determined cause as personal interest disguised as public. Issues framed around maintainability of PIL due to petitioner's personal stake and inaccurate disclosures. Ratio: PIL not maintainable when personal cause camouflaged as public, supported by scrutiny of affidavit, petition table, and absent records. Petition dismissed as not maintainable with costs of Rs.25,000/- to PGI Poor Patient Welfare Fund.

Table of Content
1. pil challenges tender processes for mohali roads. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's personal interest revealed in disclosures. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. pil dismissed for lacking public interest. (Para 6)

SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral )

1. The petitioner has filed this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) assailing certain tender processes, especially in respect of up-gradation, resurfacing and beautification of roads and junctions in Mohali under Mohali’s Next Generation Programme.

2. On the last occasion, on the asking of this Court, the petitioner has filed an affidavit disclosing his political affiliation.

3. Today, when the matter was argued, it further came to light that at page no.9 of the petition, there is a table, which contains the averment that the horticulture work of 45 meters wide road in Medicity, New Chandigarh, is being carried out by the petitioner and other works are being carried out by other contractors. When a pointed question was asked to learned counsel for the petitioner that the said contents of the tabular illustration disclose personal interest of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner explains that the same has been reproduced from another document and the said disclosure of the horticulture work being done at 45 meters wide road, Medicity, New Chandigarh, is factually incorrect. However, the pleadings in the CWP do not support the said disclosure being factually incorrect.

4. Further, the affidavit discloses that the petitioner has made several representations, but none is found on record.

6. In view of the above, we are not inclined to give further time to the petitioner and therefore, we have no hesitation to hold that the cause raised herein is in fact, a personal cause camouflaged as a public cause. Accordingly, the present petition as PIL is not maintainable and is dismissed with costs of Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with the PGI Poor Patient Welfare Fund, Chandigarh, within a period of 15 days.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top