HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURESH CHAND AMAR – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH CHAND AMAR & ORS – Respondent
CR No.7575 of 2015(O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.7575 of 2015(O&M)
Date of Decision: 09.10.2018
Suresh Chand Amar
......Petitioner
Versus
Subhash Chand Amar and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:Mr. A.S. Chadha, Advocate with
Mr. S.K. Biriwal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate
for respondent No.1.
****
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.
[1].
Petitioner has assailed the order dated 11.08.2016
passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridabad, whereby
application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 read
with Section 151 CPC for rejection of the plaint was dismissed.
[2].
At the time of issuance of notice of motion on
27.11.2015, following order was passed:-
“Learned counsel for the petitioner contends
that parties are closely related being descendants of
Sham Lal. Properties were partitioned amongst the
stakeholders by virtue of three partition instruments.
Prince Saini
2018.10.12 12:07
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
CR No.7575 of 2015(O&M)
2
Firstly it was done by way of registered partition dated
12
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.