SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 26796

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 02.02.2026 Pronounced on: 03.02.2026 Uploaded on: 03.02.2026 Gurcharan Singh …Petitioner V/S State of Punjab and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, DAG, Punjab.

None for respondent No.2.

****

SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL, J.

1. Petitioner seeks regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.157 dated 25.06.2025 under Sections 64 BNS, Section 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Sidhwan Bet, Ludhiana. Offences under Section 64 BNS and Section 6 of POCSO Act have been deleted and charges have been framed under Section 74 BNS and Section 10 POCSO Act, in alternative, under Section 76 BNS.

2. Brief facts of the case are that mother of the victim stated that her younger daughter ‘P’ was 10 years old, a student of Class V in the Government School. The day before, on 24.06.2025, ‘P’ went to Gurudwara Sahib near their house along with other children to pay obeisance and returned home at 6/6:30 PM. She looked scared, nervous and frightened. She neither ate dinner nor spoke to anyone. When she made inquiry, she shared that when she went to Gu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top