SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 26846

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VISHNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 04.02.2026 VISHNU ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Amit Pruthi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana **** (cid:1)

MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)

1. The instant one is the second petition preferred by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.114 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Sections 386, 506, 120B of IPC and Section 25(1- B)a, 25(6), 25(1) and 29(B) of Arms Act at Police Station Farukhnagar, District Gurugram.

2. As per the allegations, on 10.05.2024, ASI Sanjay Kumar, posted at the aforementioned police station, received a secret information that some members of Lawrence Bishnoi gang, namely Rohit Godara, Naveen Boxer, Lipan Nehra and Pawan Nehra, were active in the city of Gurugram for extorting money from businessmen and rich people, the main members of the group were operating from foreign countries, some of them were lodged in jails and all of them were into contact with each other through different s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top