IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VISHNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-69505-2025 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(237) CRM-M-69505-2025 (O&M)
Date of decision : 04.02.2026
VISHNU ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Amit Pruthi, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana
**** (cid:1)
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The instant one is the second petition preferred by the petitioner
under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short
“BNSS”) for grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No.114 dated
10.05.2024 registered under Sections 386, 506, 120B of IPC and Section 25(1-
B)a, 25(6), 25(1) and 29(B) of Arms Act at Police Station Farukhnagar, District
Gurugram.
2. As per the allegations, on 10.05.2024, ASI Sanjay Kumar, posted at
the aforementioned police station, received a secret information that some
members of Lawrence Bishnoi gang, namely Rohit Godara, Naveen Boxer,
Lipan Nehra and Pawan Nehra, were active in the city of Gurugram for extorting
money from businessmen and rich people, the main members of the group were
operating from foreign countries, some of them were lodged in jails and all of
them were into contact with each other through different social media apps. It
was also informed that they had even got murdered one businessman Sachin
AMIT SHARMA
2026.02.05 16:39
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE2##CRM-M-69505-2025 2
Goda in Rohtak. One of the members of this gang namely Rohit Godara had
raised demand of ransom money of Rs.2 crores from owner of Maniram Grocery
Store, Gurugram. It was informed that if the above mentioned persons and other
members of the gang were apprehended and interrogated, huge quantity of
contraband, ransom money and weapons could be recovered from them. On the
basis of this information, the aforementioned FIR was registered. Investigation
proceedings were initiated. During investigation, accused Dinesh @ Dinu was
arrested on 10.05.2024. Recovery of two mobile phones, one .30 bore
countrymade pistol alongwith five live cartridges was effected from him. On his
identification, co-accused Jagdish @ Jaggu, Pardeep, Sagar and the present
petitioner were arrested on 12.05.2024. Recovery of one .30 bore pistol and 05
live cartridges and 01 Honda City vehicle which was used in the crime, had been
effected from the petitioner. Subsequently, other accused were arrested.
Investigation now stands completed.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody since 12.05.2024. He was not
named in the FIR and has been involved in this case on the basis of disclosure
statement of the co-accused Dinesh @ Dinu which cannot be considered to be
admissible in evidence. Most of the co-accused have already been extended
benefit of bail. On parity, he too deserves to be extended the same benefit. He
does not have any criminal antecedents. No useful purpose would be served by
detaining him in custody anymore. It is, therefore, stressed that the petitioner
deserves to be extended the benefit of bail.
AMIT SHARMA
2026.02.05 16:39
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE3##CRM-M-69505-2025 3
4. Per contra, learned State counsel has vehemently argued that the
petitioner is a member of a gang operated by Lawrence Bishnoi, which was
involved in extorting money from businessmen and professionals by extending
threats to them. The petitioner was actively involved with the said gang and had
facilitated purchase of Honda City vehicle, on the asking of the co-accused
Rohit Godara and had also facilitated obtaining of arms and ammunitions to
other members of the gang. Recovery of arms has been effected from him.
Some of the co-accused are still to be arrested in the case. There are chances of
his committing similar offences or absconding, if extended benefit of bail. It is,
therefore, stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed.
5. This Court has heard the rival s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.