IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MEENA CHHIKARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (129)
Date of Decision: 04.02.2026 (Through V.C.)
Meena Chhikara …... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS is for quashing of the impugned judgment dated 30.04.2025 (P-10) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak and the impugned order dated 21.09.2019 (P-8) passed by the SDJM, Rohtak vide which the complaint (P- 7) of the petitioner for investigation and registration of FIR under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against the accused/respondents No.2 and 3, has been dismissed.
2. It is the case of the petitioner-complainant (hereinafter known as the petitioner) that her father had purchased a plot measuring 707 sq. yards from Killa No.330//4/2 for a consideration of Rs.30,000/situated in village Bohar, Tehsil and District Rohtak vide sale deed no. 1926 dated 3.6.1989 from Bishan Singh son of Kure, resident of Village Bohar through GPA holder Sunil Kumar. The possession of the plot was given
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.