IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PANKAJ JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
117 CRM-1923-2026 and CRM-5189-2026 in/and CRR-100-2026 Date of Decision:05.02.2026 PANKAJ JOSHI ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ****
Present: Mr. S. S. Mor, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. B. S. Saroha, DAG, Haryana.
****
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
CRM-1923-2026 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 26 days in filing the present revision petition is condoned.
CRM-5189-2026 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by Delhi High Court is taken on record as Annexure P-3, subject to all just exceptions.
Main case
1. Present revision petition has been filed for quashing of impugned order dated 08.09.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram in case FIR No.30/2021, dated 10.02.2021, registered under Section 408 IPC, at Police Station Sushant Lok, District Gurugram, wherein learned trial Court has closed the right of cross-examination of PW1 and PW2.
2. Learned counsel submits that it was on account of the learned counsel appearing for the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.