105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1) CRM-M-63093-2024 Date of decision: 06.02.2026 BALWINDER KAUR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT

2) CRM-M-43007-2025 SHAMO BAI @ SOMA @ SHAMO ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT C ORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. P.K.S.Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-63093-2024.

Mr. Rajvir Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-43007-2025.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

****

R AJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

1. In the above mentioned petitions common question of law and facts are involved, so both the petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment. For brevity, facts are being taken from CRM-M-63093-2024 titled as “Balwinder Kaur Versus State of Haryana.”

2. Petitioner(s) have approached by way of filing the present petition praying for grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.356 dated 08.08.2024 under Sections 15(C) of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station City Fatehabad, District Fatehabad.

3. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the police party, while on patrolling on 08.08.2024, received a secret informat