CHANDIGARH

222+223 Decided on : 09.02.2026 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS . .Petitioners Versus SATYAVART AND ANOTHER . . . Respondents

223 CWP-23840-2024 (O&M)

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS . .Petitioners Versus EX HFO JAG MOHAN LAL GARG, AND ANR . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: Mr. Sushant Kareer, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-23265-2024.

Mr. Ashish Chaudhary,Senior Panel counsel for the petitioners-UOI in CWP No. 23840-2024.

Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Advocate for Ms. Jasneet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No. 1 in CWP No. 23840-2024.

****

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)

1. Both the present petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading, involve common point of law and common set of facts, hence, they are being dealt together. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from CWP-23265-2024

2. In the present petition, challenge is to the impugned order dated 05.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2 -Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench Chandigarh (in short, ‘the Tribunal’) by which, respondent No.1 has been allowed the benefit of disability element of disability pension alongwith benefit of