IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DAYA RAM AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
NIRMALA RAO – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (284)
CR-2316-2020 (O&M)
Date of decision: - 09.02.2026 Daya Ram and another ....Petitioners Versus Nirmala Rao .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Viren Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
****
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 11.09.2020 passed by the Additional District Judge, Nuh, vide which the application filed by the present petitioners/defendants has been dismissed. 2. On 28.09.2020, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order: -
“Present:- Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner.
*****
Notice of motion for 02.11.2020.
Notice re: stay also.
In the meanwhile, execution of the decree dated
29.01.2020 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nuh (Mewat) shall remain stayed, till the next date of hearing September 28, 2020”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the first appeal filed by the petitioners against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2020 is pending for adjudication
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.