SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 934

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DAYA RAM AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
NIRMALA RAO – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (284)

CR-2316-2020 (O&M)

Date of decision: - 09.02.2026 Daya Ram and another ....Petitioners Versus Nirmala Rao .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Viren Jain, Advocate for the respondent.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 11.09.2020 passed by the Additional District Judge, Nuh, vide which the application filed by the present petitioners/defendants has been dismissed. 2. On 28.09.2020, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order: -

Present:- Mr. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

Notice of motion for 02.11.2020.

Notice re: stay also.

In the meanwhile, execution of the decree dated

29.01.2020 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nuh (Mewat) shall remain stayed, till the next date of hearing September 28, 2020”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the first appeal filed by the petitioners against the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2020 is pending for adjudication

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top