SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27121

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK BHOLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 Deepak Bhola …Petitioner.

v.

State of Haryana …Respondent.

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY.

Present: Mr. Harsh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Sanjot Singh Thind, Advocate for the complainant.

****

AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner, who is an accused in case FIR No. 102 dated 14.05.2022, registered against him for commission of offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 102-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Sector-20, Panchkula, has filed the present petition under Section

483 of BNSS for grant of bail.

2. Facts of the case as taken from para 3 of the status report filed by way of affidavit of Rakesh Kumar, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Panchkula, are reproduced as below:-

“3. That the brief facts of the instant case are that on 14.05.2020, a complaint bearing number 1532-PW, dated 29.11.2021, from Mr. Ajane Vijay Sinha, Chief Manager, Bank of India, Secto-20, Panchkula was received at the Police Station Sector-20, Panchkula through registered post. The complaint was directed against one Leena Dhir w/o Bal Kishan Dhir, R/o # 336

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top