IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 Amit Kapoor ......Petitioner Versus Tripta and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Sanjeev Majra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Nanvi Gupta, Advocate and Ms. Mamta Saini, Advocate for the respondents.
****
KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been preferred against order dated 17.11.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sonipat, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., whereby maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month (Rs.4,000/- in favour of respondent No.1 and Rs.3,000/- each in favour of respondent Nos.2 and 3 was awarded).
2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent No. 1 was solemnized on 03.05.2013, as per Hindu religious rites and ceremonies and two children were born from the said wedlock. A matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondents filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking maintenance. The petitioner filed a reply and contested the claim made by the respondents. The learned Family Court vide order dated 17.11.2023 granted maintenance to the tune of Rs.10
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.