SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8241

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 Amit Kumar ... Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent(s)

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present: Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1. This first petition for anticipatory bail has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 569 dated 13.11.2025 lodged in Police Station Bhiwani City, District Bhiwani, Haryana for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 308(5) and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, hereinafter being referred to as “BNS” only.

2. The above mentioned FIR came into being on the statement of ‘Nikunj’, hereinafter being referred to as “complainant” only. It was stated by the complainant that on 13.11.2025 at about 04.13 P.M. he received a call from mobile No. 3519243726424 wherein the caller identified himself as a member of ‘Mahender Saharan’ and ‘Rohit Godara’ gang. According to complainant on the same day at 04.17 P.M. he got a recorded voice message from mobile No.3519224372651, vide which a ransom for a sum of

3. It is the case of prosecutio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top