104 (3 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1. CRM-M-527-2026 Sahil ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent

2. CRM-M-540-2026 Tejinder Mohan ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent

3. CRM-M-1076-2026 Manmohan Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Punjab ....Respondent Date of Decision: February 09, 2026 Date of Uploading: February 09, 2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-527-2026 and CRM-M-540-2026).

Mr. H.S. Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-1076-2026).

Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

By way of the present common judgment, this Court proceeds to decide aforesaid three petitions in hand, since there is commonality and congruity of legal issues therein, as conceded by the learned rival counsel.

For the cause of convenience, the facts are drawn out from CRM-

M-527-2026 titled as Sahil versus State of Punjab.

2. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’) for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail to the petitioner(s), in case bearing FIR No.