(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:17)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:13)ti(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:26)(cid:17)(cid:27)ti(cid:19)(cid:28)(cid:3)(cid:29)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:30)(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:31)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:3)

(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:17)(cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:30)(cid:18)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:21)

(cid:1)(cid:22)(cid:2)(cid:22)(cid:1) (cid:22)(cid:30)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:19)(cid:17)!(cid:17)(cid:6)(cid:11)"(cid:10)(cid:6)"(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:8)

(cid:27)(cid:1)(cid:13)(cid:19)(cid:13)ti(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:22)(cid:30)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:19)(cid:17)!(cid:17)(cid:10)#"(cid:10)(cid:9)"(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:8)

ti(cid:27)$(cid:13)(cid:3)(cid:30)(cid:22)(cid:30)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:19)(cid:17)!(cid:17)(cid:17)(cid:10)#"(cid:10)(cid:9)"(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:8)

Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd., Chandigarh.

....Appellant Versus Jaswant Singh and another ...Respondents (cid:24)(cid:13)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:15)!(cid:17)(cid:21)(cid:13)(cid:19)%(cid:29)$(cid:22)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:1)"(cid:17)(cid:28)ti(cid:2)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:24)(cid:22)(cid:17)(cid:30)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:27)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:30)(cid:22)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:2)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:3)$&(cid:3)

Present: Mr. S.S. Dalal, Advocate for appellant/defendant.

Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the respondents/plaintiffs.

*****

(cid:30)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:27)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:30)(cid:22)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:2)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:21)(cid:17)(cid:19)(cid:3)$&(cid:3)’(cid:17)(cid:28)"(cid:17)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 27.07.2005 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Karnal (hereinafter to be referred as ‘Lower Appellate Court’) whereby the appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial Court’) was dismissed as well as against the judgment and decree dated 14.02.2005 passed by the trial Court, whereby the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs was decreed and the respondents/plaintiffs were held entitled to the benefit of adhoc/work6charged service for the purpose of seniority and pay fixation etc.

2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent/plaintiff No.1 Jaswant Singh was appointed on the post of Clerk on adhoc basis in Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd. (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Bank’) on 26.08.1974 and respondent/plaintiff No.2 Jaljeet Singh was appointed on the post of Clerk on adhoc basis on 02.02.1975. The services of respondents/plaintiffs were terminated vide order dated 20.07.1977 passed by the appellant/defendant6Bank and were relieved from their duties on 22.07.1977. Employees’ union of the appellant/defendant6Bank raised various demands. One of the demand was in regard to termination of services of respondents/plaintiffs and other similarly situated employees. However, no settlement was arrived at between the parties, as a consequence of this, the matter was referred to the Industrial Tribunal, U.T. Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Tribunal’). The Tribunal vide award dated 12.02.1990 (Ex.D1) held the termination of respondents/plaintiffs was illegal and they were held entitled to be reinstated in service along with full back6wages. In pursuance to the award dated 12.02.1990 passed by the Tribunal, the respondents/plaintiffs were reinstated in service. After reinstatement, the respondents/plaintiffs submitted representation to the appellant/defendant6 Bank for counting of adhoc service rendered by them, before their services were terminated for the purpose of seniority, pay fixation and promotion etc. The abovesaid representation submitted by the respondents/plaintiffs was rejected by the appellant/defendant6Bank. Aggrieved against the action of the app