In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

228 Date of Decision:- 10.02.2026 Sonu Ram … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Ms. Priya Sahoo, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant A.G., Haryana.

*****

SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.90 dated 11.04.2025 registered under Sections 109(1), 3(5) and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Civil Line, District Kaithal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the present petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as the petitioner is not named in the present FIR. He was nominated on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused. He is in custody since 06.09.2025. He was falsely implicated in a case FIR No.222 dated 11.04.2025 as petitioner after his working hours was just going to drop off his friend i.e. co-accused to his village. The petitioner has already been released on regular bail in aforesaid FIR No.222 dated 11.04.2025. Thus, learned counsel prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

3. Status report by way