SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-41147-2019 (O&M)

Decided on:- 10.02.2026 Sonu and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Roshan Lal Saini, Advocate for Mr. Tushar Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Abhishek Yadav, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. R.S. Hooda, Advocate for respondent No. 2 (through V.C.).

* * * * *

AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Petitioners Sonu, Rahul @ Monu, Parul, Jyoti, Bharti, Mukesh, Renu, Chotu, Anita and Sunita filed petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of Complaint No. 365/2015 (Annexure P/6) filed on 10.12.2015, summoning order dated 31.07.2019 (Annexure P/7) passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mewat and subsequent proceedings arising thereon in aforesaid complaint.

2. As per the facts narrated in complaint (Annexure P-6), complainant Shashi Devi alleged that she was residing in the house on rent and in other portion of house, Shiv Kumar was residing on rent, with whom their neighbour Sonu was having family relations. Complainant narrated incident of 27.03.2014 at 07:30 AM, when she was moping the floor and Sonu came there. She tol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top