IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 10.2.2026 Sandeep ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Kaushik, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Gugnani, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Geeta Rani, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sarfraj Anjum Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
****
KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 314 dated 02.6.2023, under Section 376 and 406 IPC (Sections 323, 506 and 34 IPC were deleted later on), registered at Police Station Sonipat City, District Sonipat and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom including the challan dated 20.4.2023 (Annexure P-2).
2. The brief factual matrix relevant and essential for disposal of the present petition, is that respondent No. 2 has got registered the present FIR against the accused-petitioner and other co-accused, alleging therein that she met the petitioner for securing a job. The petitioner started visiting her house and when her husband was not home, the petitioner committed rape upon her. Upon raising noise
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.