IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-7605-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.02.2026 Ashu Mohammad ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate for the petitioner.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking direction to the learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate to the effect that the petitioner may be permitted to furnish a single surety bond in all the FIRs, whereby he has been granted bail by the Court concerned.

2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in thirteen FIRs registered against him under Section 136 of the Electricity Act at different police stations. It is further submitted that the petitioner has a permanent abode and there is no likelihood of his absconding or evading the process of law. Although the petitioner has been granted bail in all the thirteen FIRs, as detailed in Annexure P-1, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, however, the condition requiring him to furnish se