SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PANKAJ ALIAS PANKAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

236 Date of Decision: 10.02.2026 Pankaj @ Pankaj Kumar ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Manjot Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

***

MANISHA BATRA , J. (Oral)

1. The present one is the third petition as filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking concession of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.438 dated 23.06.2023, registered under Section 18 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) (Section 29 of NDPS Act added later on), at Police Station Thanesar Sadar, District Kurukshetra.

2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that eversince the dismissal of his previous petitions, the trial has not progressed much since only 01 out of 17 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far. There are no chances of conclusion of the same in near future. No useful purpose would be served by keeping him in custody any more. It is, therefore, urged that the petition deserves to be allowed.

3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top