IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GEETA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
210 Date of decision: 10.02.2026 Geeta ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.
----
MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR mentioned below:-
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
245 26.08.2025 Adarsh Nagar, District 115, 190, 191(3), 304, Faridabad 333, 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNS”) (117(2)
of BNS added later on)
2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the complainant Rajbati alleging that his son Rohit was married with accused Rajni in the year 2023. There was matrimonial discord between them and she had lodged a complaint against them at the police station previously. On the night of 24.08.2025, the petitioner who is mother of Rajni accompanied by the co-accu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.