SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27370

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATYADEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Satyadeep ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 03.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 10.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 10.02.2026 website

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Advocate and Ms. Neha Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.

Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate, for the complainant.

***

MANISHA BATRA , J.

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in the FIR mentioned below:-

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

1268 02.12.2023 Hisar Sadar,147, 148, 149, 201, 302, District Hisar 307, 341, 427, 506 and

120-B of IPC and 25 (1-B) (a), 25(6) and 27 of Arms Act, 1959

2. As per the allegations, on 01.12.2023, the complainant-Ji

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top