IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATYADEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Satyadeep ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent
1. The date when the judgment is reserved 03.02.2026 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 10.02.2026 3. The date when the judgment is uploaded on the 10.02.2026 website
4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced
5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment, and reasons thereof CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Advocate and Ms. Neha Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State.
Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate, for the complainant.
***
MANISHA BATRA , J.
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in the FIR mentioned below:-
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
1268 02.12.2023 Hisar Sadar,147, 148, 149, 201, 302, District Hisar 307, 341, 427, 506 and
120-B of IPC and 25 (1-B) (a), 25(6) and 27 of Arms Act, 1959
2. As per the allegations, on 01.12.2023, the complainant-Ji
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.