SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27374

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Reserved: 20.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement: 10.02.2026 MK ....Appellant.

Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents.

***

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR .......

Argued by: Mr. Sanjeet Sood, Advocate with Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab.

***

Sukhvinder Kaur , J .

1. Appellant/ prosecutrix has preferred the instant appeal against judgment dated 29.03.2025, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Amritsar, vide which respondent No.2/accused Navjit Singh has been acquitted.

2. The present FIR was registered on the basis of statement of complainant/ prosecutrix (name not disclosed to conceal her identity and hereinafter referred as prosecutrix) made before the police, alleging therein that she had been in love affair with the accused for the last one and a half years. She also stated that in the last December, he took her to Shimla for one week and thereafter, she got pregnant and accused got the pregnancy aborted and promised to solemnize marriage with her, but now he had refused for the same and had also g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top