261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 11.02.2026.

(1)

CRM-M-45294-2023 (O&M)

SAHEB RISHEB ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s)

(2)

CRM-M-48545-2019 (O&M)

ANITA SEKHRI ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER …Respondent(s)

(3)

ANITA SEKHRI ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER …Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Ishima Randhawa, Advocate, and Ms. Akshita Tandon, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Saurav Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab.

Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The above-mentioned three petitions seeking quashing of the FIRs along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, are being decided by this common order, as they pertain between the same parties and emanate from the same dispute. The petitioner Saheb Risheb in CRM-M- 45294-2023 is the son of Anita Sekhri, petitioner in CRM-M-48454-2019 and CRM-M-48606-2019.

2 The details of the cases are tabulated as under: -

3 Both the FIRs i.e. FIR No.618 dated 11.10.2016, as well as FIR No.387 dated 18.08.2016, have been got registered on the statement of Dhani Ram-r