IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

234 Date of decision: 11.02.2026 Nirmal Singh ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS State of Punjab and Another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Mehak Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s)

(Legal Aid Counsel).

Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG Punjab.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

CRM-49560-2011 & CRM-2553-2012 These applications have been filed for impleadment of legal heirs of Nand Kishore i.e. Sunita Devi, wife of Nand Kishore as respondent No.2 and injured person-Vijay Kumar, son of Ram Saran as respondent No.3, respectively, in the main petition.

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed for the purpose of pursuing the instant petition only.

Amended Memo of Parties are taken on record.

Main case

1. The instant criminal revision petition has been preferred against the judgment and order of sentence dated 31.10.2005 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapurthala whereby the revisionist- petitioner had been convicted for commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 304-A, 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) in case bearing FIR N