SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1506-2026 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 11.02.2026 Subhash Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA K. KALSON Present:- Mr. Shivam Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

NEERJA K. KALSON, J . (Oral)

1. Instant revision petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 03.04.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jagadhri whereby the application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. by the complainant and the Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State for recalling DW-1 Parveen Kumar for further cross-examination, was allowed. 2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present revision petition are as follows :

(i) That the petitioner is the father-in-law of respondent No.2/complainant Manju Bala, who was married to petitioner's son Rohit. Unfortunately, the matrimonial relations between Rohit and Manju were strained, resulting in multiple litigations between the parties. On 05.09.2015, the complainant lodged an FIR No. 148 under Sections 354, 354-A, 354-B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top