SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on:-02.2.2026 Date of Decision: 11.2.2026 Gian Chand and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents

1 The date when the judgment is reserved 02.2.2026

2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 11.02.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 11.02.2026

4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full N.A.

judgment, and reasons thereof.

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Argued by: Mr. Ajay Malvia, Advocate, Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate and Mr. Pratik Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Guramrit Kaur, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

****

KIRTI SINGH , J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 96/2023 dated 18.11.2023, under Sections 498-A, 323, 354, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Shahpur Kandi, District Pathankot and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

Factual matrix

2. The facts in brief, are that the marriage between the son of the petitioners, namely S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top