SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
AMIT AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

228 CRM-A-836-2019 (O&M)

Date of decision: 12.02.2026.

STATE OF HARYANA ... Appellant(s)

VERSUS AMIT AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana, for appellant.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The instant appeal has been preferred by the State against the judgment dated 26.07.2017, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, in Sessions Case No. 53 of 2015 dated 31.03.2015/22.04.2016, CIS No.SC/147/2015 arising out of FIR bearing No.647 dated 21.09.2013, under Sections 148, 149, 325 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Sadar Gurugram, whereby the respondents had been acquitted of the charges framed against them under Section 148, 149, 325 and 506 of the IPC.

2 The facts of the prosecution case are that on 14.09.2013, a ruqa was received from Paras Hospital regarding the admission of Parveen in an injured condition. The SI reached the hospital and obtained a copy of the MLR. He also moved an application for an opinion as to whether the injured Parveen was fit to make a statement. The doctor opined that the injured was unfit to make

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top