SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8469

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAHIL GARG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

104-1

1. CRM-M-1821-2026 Sahil Garg ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent

2. CRM-M-1845-2026 Sahil Garg ....Petitioner V/s State of Punjab ....Respondent DDaattee ooff ddeecciissiioonn:: 1122..0022..22002266 Date of Uploading : 16.02.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Harshit Jangra, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-1821-2026.

Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-1845-2026.

Mr. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. These are two petitions having been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory/pre-arrest bail under Sections 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘BNSS’) in FIR No.229 dated 09.12.2025 registered for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 317(2), 61(2) of BNS at Police Station Dirba, District Sangrur.

2. The gravamen of the FIR in question reflects that the criminal law was set into motion on the basis of complaint moved by the complainant Jatinder Kumar alleging that he was stated to be managing the firm M/s Jainam Foods, Ladwanjara Kalan, en

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top