##PAGE1##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

(102) RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M)

Reserved on: 18.03.2026 Pronounced on: 30.03.2026

Uploaded on: 06.04.2026

Avtar Singh (since deceased) through LRs. …Appellant

Versus

Balwinder Singh and others …Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Argued by: Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nikita Sharma,Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate

for the respondent nos. 2 to 4.

*****

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE2##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 2

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE3##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 3

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE4##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 4

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE5##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 5

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE6##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 6

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE7##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 7

A careful consideration of the judgments of the Courts below shows

that the findings recorded therein are based on proper appreciation of the evid- ence on record. No material evidence has been ignored, nor has any misread- ing of evidence been demonstrated. The conclusions arrived at are reasonable

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

##PAGE8##

RSA No:- 1924-1995 (O&M) 8

and do not suffer from perversity or illegality. In view of the foregoing discus- sion, it is evident that the appellant has failed to make out any case for inter- ference. The findings recorded by the Courts below are concurrent, well- reasoned and based on evidence, and no ground is made out to disturb the

same.

17. Accordingly, the present Regular Second Appeal is dismissed and the judg-

ments and decrees passed by the Courts below are affirmed.

18. Since the main appeal stands decided, all pending miscellaneous applic-

ation(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)

JUDGE

30.03.2026 Saurav Pathania (i) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable : Yes/No

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.04.06 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document