SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 263

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ACHIL KUMAR ETC. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PB. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S No.475-SB of 2004 (O&M)

Reserved on: 14.01.2026 Pronounced on: 30.03.2026 Achil Kumar and another ......Appellants Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CRA-S No.449-SB of 2004 (O&M)

Reserved on: 14.01.2026 Shakti Chem. and another ......Appellants Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Jugansh Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the appellants in CRA-S No.449-SB of 2004; and Mr. Sangram Singh Saron and Mr. Madhav Rao Rajwade, Advocate for the appellants in CRA-S No.475-SB of 2004.

Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

Since the issue involved in both the appeals is identical, these appeals are being disposed of, vide a common order and judgment. However, the facts are being derived from CRA-S-449-SB-2004.

2. A complaint filed by the State of Punjab through Chief Agricultural Officer, Kapurthala alleging the commission of offence punishable under Sections 7 and 12AA of ‘Essential Commodities Act 1955’, read with clause 19(1)(a), 19(1)(c)(v) of ‘Fertilizer Control Order 1985’, culminated into judgment of conviction of four a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top