SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 264

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 15.01.2026 Pronounced on: 30.03.2026 Prem Kumar and another ......Appellants Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. M.S.Uppal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab.

SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) :

This appeal against conviction is arising out of judgment dated

23.09.2004, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Mansa. The above mentioned judgment was rendered in a case arising out of FIR No.99 dated 09.10.2001, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 Indian Penal Code, hereinafter being referred to as ‘IPC’, only, Police Station Sardulgarh. By virtue of above mentioned judgment both the accused (appellants herein) have been held guilty and convicted, accordingly. Thereafter vide order on quantum of sentence, of even date, following sentence has been awarded to them:

Under Rigorous Fine of In default of payment of fine Section imprisonment Rs.300/- to undergo rigorous 306 IPC for one and imprisonment for three half year months

2. Heard.

3. It has been contented on behalf of appellants that an error of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top