IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :30.03.2026 SAHIL TALWAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS VE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES LTD. ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner- JD under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside of the impugned order dated 05.01.2026 (Annexure P-13) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram, whereby the objections filed by the Judgment Debtor under Section 47 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, along with another application seeking stay of the execution petition till disposal of the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, were dismissed.

2. The principal argument raised on behalf of the petitioner-JD is that, despite the pendency of his application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, the Executing Court has proceeded with the execution of the money decree without examining the merits of the case or considering that the petitioner-JD has a prima facie case and is likely to succeed in the said application.

3. The facts of