IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PRAKASH CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Prakash Chaudhary ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 25.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 30.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 30.03.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full
4 Full judgment is pronounced The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and Not
5 reasons thereof applicable CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana.
MANISHA BATRA, J.
1. Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No. 264 dated 17.12.2024, registered under Sections 308(2), 318(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 351(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 [Sections 238 and 241 of BNS added later on] at Police Station Cyber Crime, Panipat.
2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a wr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.