Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sumeet Goel, J
Navjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural history and factual allegations leading to the third bail application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the conflict between the defense's claim of false implication and the state's argument against the maintainability of successive pleas. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. governing principles for successive bail and the societal impact of the alleged crimes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. analysis of maintainability, petitioner's conduct, and the necessity to stop forum shopping and procedural abuse. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final order dismissing the petition with costs for procedural abuse. (Para 10) |
*****
SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition is the third attempt under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’) for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No. 155 dated 07.12.2025 under Sections 316(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 61(2) of BNS and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professional (Regulation) Act, Police Station City Zira, District Ferozepur
The first petition bearing CRM-M-1419-2026 (Annexure P-3) for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail filed before this Court was disposed of on 14.01.2026. Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
