SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Monika …..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents Reserved on : 23.03.2026 Pronounced on : 30.03.2026 Uploaded on : 30.03.2026 Whether full judgment is pronounced or operative part thereof : Full CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA K. KALSON Present:- Mr. Rahul Gahlian, Advocate and Mr. Shokeen Singh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana.

****

NEERJA K. KALSON, J .

1. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 06.09.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the judgment dated 22.03.2018 passed by Ld. Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Narnaul in Criminal Case No. 60 of 2016 whereby respondents No. 2 to 4 were acquitted, was dismissed and the acquittal of the respondents No. 2 to 4 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 read with Section

34 IPC was affirmed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Courts below have failed to properly appreciate the testimony of the complainant. It is contended that the complainant had clearly deposed regarding harassment and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top