IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : April 01, 2026 NAR SINGH BAHADUR -PETITIONER V/S PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-

LABOUR COURT-III, FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Mansi Majoka, Advocate, and Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majoka, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Bansal, D.A.G., Haryana.

***

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

1. The present writ petition assails the award dated 23.01.2020 (Annexure P-1), whereby the Industrial Tribunal, Faridabad, despite holding that the termination of the petitioner/workman was illegal, declined to order his reinstatement and instead directed the respondent No.2/management to pay monetary compensation of ₹55,000/-.

2. Concisely and compendiously, the case set up by the workman in his demand notice dated 25.11.2014, which constituted the bedrock of the impugned award, was that he was appointed as an Electrician with the management on 10.05.2012, and his last drawn salary was ₹11,000/- per month. He alleged that he had continuously served the management from 10.05.2012 to 11.10.2014, when his services were terminated without any legal notice and without complian