220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-1621-2025 DECIDED ON: 01.04.2026 PARDEEP …..PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: None for the petitioner.

Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryana.

ANOOP CHITKARA J (ORAL)

Prayer in the present petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to release the petitioner on 10 weeks regular parole leave under Section 3 of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act 2022 to meet his family members and quashing of the order dated 10.01.2025 (Annexure P-2)

whereby request of petitioner was declined.

2. The matter has been called twice, but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Learned State Counsel has produced the custody certificate of the petitioner in the Court today, which is taken on record. He submits that parole was POONAM denied to the petitioner as he did not fulfill the requisite parole conditions and refer para No.6 and 7 of reply dated 25.03.2025 which read as follow:-

“That earlier the convict/petitioner came under the category of hardcore as he was convicted and sentenced under sect