SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 2098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TARSEM CHAND AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. 

The instant appeal has been instituted by the appellants-claimants seeking enhancement in compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mansa (for short `the MACT’), on account of death of one Roop Chand, who expired in a motor vehicular accident, which took place on 15.08.2009.

2. A claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short `the MV Act’) was instituted by the sons of one Roop Chand. It was pleaded that on 15.08.2009 at about 3.10 PM, the said Roop Chand alongwith his wife Kanta Rani (who had also died in the accident in question) and claimant-Tarsem Chand @ Pappu (who too had received injuries in the said accident), were coming from Patiala to Mansa in an Indica car bearing registration no. PB-31-E-5902 being driven by Kala Singh @ Jasbir Singh. It was further claimed that a Ford Fiesta car bearing registration No. HR-036-6177 (hereinafter to be referred as `the offending vehicle’), being driven by respondent no.1 in a rash and negligent manner, came from the side of Cheema and hit the said Indica car. As a result of the same, all the occupants of the India car received serious injuries. Whereas Roop Chan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top