IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 01.04.2026 Chhavi Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Naresh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.56 dated 17.04.2024 registered under Sections 420, 465, 467 and 120-B of IPC, at Police Station City-1 Mansa, District Mansa.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with co-accused duped the complainant for a sum of Rs.9,80,000/-, under the pretext of sending his son abroad. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the complainant himself voluntarily deposited an amount of Rs.17,23,000/- for facilitating the migration of his son abroad. However, there is no allegation of fraudulent or dishonest intention