SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 27731

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AVTAR SINGH ALIAS AVTAR MAHEY – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 22.01.2026 Pronounced on: 01.04.2026 Uploaded on: 02.04.2026 Avtar Singh @ Avtar Mahey ....Petitioner V/s Mohinder Singh and another .…Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Argued by: Ms. Sheenu Rapriya, Advocate and Mr. HPS Ishar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Shashank Bhandari, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG, Haryana.

*****

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.

The instant contempt petition, preferred under Article 215 of the Constitution of India and Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the “1971 Act”) alleges willful disobedience of the directions issued by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Arnesh Kumar V/s State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and further reiterated in the case of Mohd. Asfak Alam V/s The State of Jharkhand and another, (2023) 10 SCALE 370.

2. The case set up is that an FIR No.157 dated 18.09.2024 (Annexure P-3) was registered at Police Station Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar, on the statement of one Ms. ‘X’ under Sections 74, 75 and 76 of the Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “the BNS”) against the present petitioner.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top