IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

119 CR-2689-2026 Date of decision:01.04.2026 HARLEEN KAUR @ VEERI AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS VERSUS ISHWAR CHAND ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Jaskamal Singh Grewal, Advocate for petitioner.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

Present civil revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by petitioners for setting aside the order dated 18.11.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the appeal filed by respondent against dismissal of his application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) read with Section 151 of CPC was allowed.

2. Case of respondent was that property owned by him and petitioners was joint property and an electric motor of 7.5 BHP bearing account No.K56-AP/43 is in existence in the name of Smt. Seeto wife of Paras Ram. After death of Smt. Seeto, the property was inherited by her legal heirs including Sant Ram. Respondent had purchased part of suit property from Sant Ram which is part of joint land vide registered sale deed and thereafter respondent is using joint electric motor connection for purpos